Skip to Content

From Complexity to Clarity: Negotiating Enterprise-Grade Cisco Contracts

Understanding Cisco Enterprise Agreements can be complex, but with the right approach enterprises can navigate these contracts effectively.  Key strategies involve mapping the contract landscape and ensuring financial protections against underperformance.

In this 7-minute podcast, LB3 partner Marc Lindsey and Tony Mangino discuss how enterprises can move from complexity to clarity when negotiating with Cisco, and how they can avoid the “value trap” of bundled software, support, and services.

If you would like to learn more about our experience in this space, please visit TC2’s Strategic Sourcing and Technology Consulting & Strategy Development and LB3’s Information Technology Advisory webpages.


Follow us on LinkedIn:  LB3 & TC2

From Complexity to Clarity: Negotiating Enterprise-Grade Cisco Contracts

Tony:

Hello, today is Wednesday , June 4th, 2025.  I’m Tony Mangino from TC2 and this is Staying Connected. Today, we’re unraveling one of the more complex—and sometimes confounding—agreements in IT procurement: the Cisco Enterprise Agreement.

If you’ve ever opened one of these contracts and felt like you fell into a maze of linked documents and shifting commitments… you’re not alone.

Joining me today is Marc Lindsey, an enterprise technology attorney at LB3 who’s guided large organizations through high-value Cisco deals. Marc, welcome.

Marc:

Thanks, Tony. Glad to be here. Cisco agreements are dense—but with the right structure, they can deliver real value to enterprises.

Tony:

Let’s start at the beginning. Cisco gives you what looks like a straightforward agreement—but it’s not.

Marc:

Right. The general terms document is just seven pages, but it links to a web of program terms, datasheets, privacy terms, and offer descriptions. Each of those may link to more. These references change frequently, and there’s no master index.

For buyers, step one is to map the landscape. Know exactly what documents apply to your deal. Don’t assume Cisco will lay it all out for you.

Tony:

So before you negotiate, you need to know what you’re even agreeing to.

Marc:

Exactly. No redlines until you have a roadmap. Otherwise, you’re negotiating blind.

Tony:

Sounds like high-stakes exploration in the wilderness.

Marc:

Right, it is easy to get lost and miss something critical without a methodical approach.

Tony:

Say I’m a large enterprise—do I have to stick with Cisco’s contract structure?

Marc:

Not if you have high spend leverage or are growing significantly into products flagged as high priority on Cisco’s strategic product sales roadmap.  Enterprises with meaningful or strategic spend can start with their own custom master agreement provided it is adapted to accommodate Cisco’s product and sales delivery models. You shape the overall agreement framework, attach all referenced terms, and build in your desired protections from the start.

Cisco will resist, but if your spend or purchase profile justifies it, it’s a strong position you can use.

Tony:

And if you don’t have that leverage?

Marc:

You can still gain advantage using Cisco’s general terms and conditions by targeting the most important risks. Even if you can’t overhaul the boilerplate, focus on improving key areas:
– Lock down ownership of your data and limit Cisco’s use of it to protect your enterprise’s digital monetization strategy.

– Raise the liability caps to reflect your actual financial commitment and spend with Cisco for the term of the contract.

– Carveout Cisco’s data breach liability from the normal cap, and make it a meaningful multiple of the direct cap.

– List all of the applicable incorporated Cisco documents applicable to your use and purchase of the in-scope products and services

– But then prevent these incorporated documents from overriding your negotiated terms.

-Obtain rights to replace end of life / end of sale products with equivalent newer substitute products at the same price.

– Severely restrict Cisco’s right to suspend services.

– Broaden the reach of Cisco’s IP indemnifications to cover use of Cisco’s products with other products as intended.

Instead of chasing every issue presented by Cisco’s standard terms, zero in on making strategic changes.

Tony:

Let’s talk about the Enterprise Agreement itself. It sounds promising—bundled software, support, services—but I’ve also heard you refer to it as a “value trap.” Why?

Marc:

Because Cisco’s EA bundles lock you into 3–5 years of prepaid software and services. But what you paid for can change—or disappear—midstream. If you don’t negotiate safeguards, you could be stuck with sunk costs for discontinued products.

Tony:

So you’re paying up front, but you might not get what you paid for?

Marc:

Exactly. The biggest risk is the gap between payment and performance. Cisco’s standard terms don’t offer strong remedies if products are retired or underdeliver.

We negotiate termination rights for underperformance, and credits if products are discontinued. Refunds are ideal, but credits are more common. Also, clarify how pricing maps to individual products—otherwise, you can’t assess value.

Tony:

You’re tying performance to financial accountability.

Marc:

Right. That keeps incentives aligned.

Tony:

Here’s where it gets alphabet-soupy. Cisco doesn’t always contract directly. You’ve got VARs, SPAs, SRAs—what’s going on?

Marc:

Right—Cisco often routes software, service, and cloud-centric EAs through value-added resellers (VARs).  Hardware and hardware-embedded software purchases also run through VARs, but the discount structures are governed by Strategic Relationship Agreements (SRA) or Strategic Partnership Agreements (SPAs). SPAs and SRAs are short, sweet, and packed with discount logic that must be carefully negotiated to generate the desired hardware savings

Tony:

Sounds like we’ll need a separate episode on that VAR tangle. But for today, what are the three most important takeaways?

Marc:

First – Map the contract landscape. Know every linked offer description, program and products terms, and policy hiding behind Cisco’s boilerplate.

Second – Fix the framework. Negotiate a master agreement that defines what you’re actually buying and Cisco is committed to deliver—and also protects your negotiated terms against subsequent unilateral changes by Cisco to its standard incorporated documents.

Third – Future-proof the savings. Lock in product substitution rights and financial recovery remedies in both your Cisco and VAR contracts for when Cisco’s products and services evolve or under-perform.

Tony:

Marc, thank you for breaking this down. For anyone navigating a Cisco EA, this is essential advice.

To our listeners: take your time, understand the terrain, and bring in the right expertise. If you’d like to learn more about Negotiating Enterprise-Grade Cisco Contracts or you have other ICT needs, you can connect with Marc or me—and our LB3 and TC2 colleagues by giving us a call or by email.

You can also stay up to date on strategic sourcing issues by subscribing to our Staying Connected podcast, by checking out our websites, and by following us on LinkedIn.